FLOOD-MAP SITE REVIEW WORKSHEET
Prepared by Pillar, October 30, 2026.
Manual research and handoff template. No field is automatically verified.
This worksheet does not determine buildability, development permission,
insurance requirements or an engineering design.

REVIEW QUESTION
Project / candidate:
Proposed use and concept revision:
Decision the review is intended to support:
Analyst and date checked:

SITE IDENTITY AND REVIEWED AREA
County / jurisdiction evidence:
Each parcel ID and boundary source:
Boundary source date / version:
Total proposed project boundary / file:
Concept layout revision / file (if available):
Location method (address pin, parcel match, other):
Exact portion actually inspected:
Portions not inspected or uncertain matches:
Access / off-site connections included in this review, if any:
Method used to compare the site boundary with the flood information:
Saved map extent / capture / comparison file:

REPEAT FOR EACH SOURCE PRODUCT OR DIFFERENT OBSERVATION
Product title / URL / file:
Panel / study / other reference as stated by the source:
Product status as stated (effective / preliminary / historic / unknown):
Source date and what that date describes:
Date retrieved or checked:
Legend / layer / selected display settings:
Zone as displayed:
Full subtype / legend description:
Raw source identifiers if available (keep original field names):
FLD_AR_ID:
FLD_ZONE:
ZONE_SUBTY:
SFHA_TF:
SOURCE_CIT:
Do not infer dates or status from these identifiers.
Which reviewed portion does this observation concern?
Observation and saved supporting evidence:
What this source does not answer:
Conflicts with other sources / product versions:

FOLLOW-UP
Question for the relevant reviewer:
Required source, measurement or response:
Person responsible and date needed:
Response date / file:
Area, proposal and revision covered by the response:
Conditions / limitations / outstanding questions:
Screening decision and evidence supporting it:
Reason and date to revisit:

Do not carry a blank field forward as a negative finding.
Keep source observations separate from proposed design or acquisition decisions.