LAND FEASIBILITY HANDOFF
Suggested review format for a defined homebuilding proposal.

PROJECT AND SCOPE
Proposed housing product / program:
Decision this review needs to support:
Jurisdiction and responsible planning authority:
Parcel IDs, stored as text:
Boundary source and version:
Gross acreage and basis (keep deeded and GIS fields separate):
Prepared by / date:
Linked desktop screening record:

EVIDENCE RECORD — repeat for each observed fact
Question:
Observation (or Unknown):
Source URL / document and page:
Source date / date checked:
Scope and conditions of the observation:
Confidence and reason:
Discrepancy or evidence still needed:

CONCEPT SCENARIO — repeat for each version
Scenario name and date:
Boundary version:
Housing product and lot-dimension assumptions:
Road / drainage / open-space / other allocation assumptions:
Concept geometry or file:
Proposed lot count (Scenario, not approved yield):
Requirements checked and sources:
Inputs still assumed:
What changed from the previous scenario:

COMMERCIAL INPUTS — keep attached to the scenario
Land-price assumption and basis:
Comparison records (asking vs completed sale; date; acreage basis):
Cost estimate source, date, scope, and exclusions:
Unpriced or unverified workstreams (Unknown, not zero):
Timing assumptions and dependencies:
Responsible reviewer:

OPEN QUESTION / HANDOFF — repeat as needed
Workstream: Planning / Boundary / Environmental / Access / Utilities /
Design or engineering / Market or cost / Other
Question that could change the decision:
Evidence, document, study, or provider/agency response needed:
Proposal or scenario covered by that inquiry:
Responsible person or professional:
Target follow-up date:
Response received, date, scope, and conditions (or Unknown):
Scenario or decision affected by the response:

DECISION RECORD
Current decision and rationale:
Evidence supporting it:
Unresolved dependencies:
Next decision, reviewer, and review date:
What would change the conclusion:

Keep facts, scenarios, and unknowns separate. This worksheet does not supply
a survey, valuation, engineering design, environmental determination,
utility commitment, development approval, or acquisition recommendation.