PILLAR — UTILITY SERVICE REQUEST AND RESPONSE WORKSHEET
Prepared October 16, 2026. Manual editorial tool; not an issued utility
approval, engineering analysis, legal opinion or tested product feature.
Use the actual provider's current process and the responsible reviewer's advice.
Keep a separate entry for each service, response and named project scenario.
Use unknown / not stated / not applicable with a reason; do not leave a blank
that could be read as approval, zero demand or zero cost.

RECORD
Entry ID:
Prepared by / date:
Service: water / wastewater / other (specify):
Provider / responsible reviewing group:
Service area or provider responsibility confirmed by / source / date:
Property address / jurisdiction:
Parcel IDs and parcel source/date:

PROPOSAL SENT TO THE PROVIDER
Scenario name / version / date:
Housing type / proposed unit count / phasing:
Plan or exhibit filename / version / date:
Connection location proposed or discussed (source / unknown):
Demand quantity / units:
Demand basis / preparer / source / date (or unknown):
Provider-required inputs still missing:
Request submitted date / reference (or not submitted):

RESPONSE — RETAIN THE ACTUAL FILE
File or public URL / issued date / reference number:
Document stage (request, acknowledgment, preliminary response, approval, other):
Scenario and service the response expressly covers:
Relevant clause / page / section for each conclusion:
Supported service/capacity conclusion in the provider's words or a faithful summary:
Conditions stated in the response:
Capacity reserved? yes / no / not stated — source clause:
Reservation quantity and units, if stated:
Approval/effective date, if stated:
Expiry / renewal / milestones, if stated:
Responsible person and reminder date for stated term:

OPEN WORK — EACH ITEM NEEDS ITS OWN OWNER
Question / evidence needed / responsible person / target date / status:
1.
2.
3.
Possible prompts, only where relevant: provider/service responsibility;
connection location and route; required extensions or other infrastructure;
separate reviews; work/cost responsibility; cost estimate scope and exclusions.
Keep cost unknown when no scoped estimate exists; do not substitute zero.

CHANGE CHECK
Revised scenario / date:
Changed unit count, phase, layout, connection, demand basis or other input:
Applicability question sent to provider / date / reference:
Provider response / date / file:
Applicability status: confirmed for revision / needs further work / unknown:

HANDOFF
Decision being considered:
What this entry currently supports:
Unresolved dependencies and effect on that decision:
Next reviewer / next action / date:
Files supplied with this entry:

FICTIONAL EXAMPLE — NO REAL PROPERTY OR PROVIDER RESPONSE
Concept A: 42 homes. Concept B: 56 homes. Both are invented concept counts.
Water/A: preliminary response received; later demand submission outstanding;
reservation not stated. Keep that response attached to A.
Wastewater/A and B: response missing.
Water/B: applicability unknown; ask the provider what revised inputs are needed.
No flow, capacity, engineering design, cost or approval is calculated here.